AH假设作为影响最大的可及性假设,在母语习得和二语习得研究领域得到广泛应用和检验,而与之相对的通格假设同样具有跨语言的普遍解释力。本文基于汉语关系从句来验证AH假设和通格假设,分析两大假设的不同预测能力,认为通格假设较之AH假设能更好地解释汉语的关系化现象。 As the most influential assumptions, AH hypothesis has been widely used and tested in the field of L1 acquisition and second language acquisition research, while the opposite Toughgg hypotheses also have cross-linguistic universal interpretations. In this paper, based on the Chinese relation clause to verify the AH hypothesis and the hypothesis, analysis of the two hypotheses of different predictive ability, that the hypothesis Tong than the AH hypothesis to better explain the relationship between the Chinese phenomenon.