论文部分内容阅读
目的提高临床对应激性心肌病的认识,以防误诊。方法对16例误诊患者进行回顾性分析。结果 16例患者均在应激情况下发病,临床辅助检查与急性心肌梗死不相符,而符合应激性心肌病特点,诊断为应激性心肌病。结论对拟诊为急性心肌梗死患者进行鉴别诊断时,应考虑应激性心肌病的可能。
Objective To improve the clinical understanding of stress cardiomyopathy to prevent misdiagnosis. Methods 16 cases of misdiagnosis were retrospectively analyzed. Results All the 16 patients were diagnosed as stress cardiomyopathy under the condition of stress. The clinical assistant examination did not accord with acute myocardial infarction, which accorded with the characteristics of stress cardiomyopathy. Conclusion The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with differential diagnosis, should consider the possibility of stress cardiomyopathy.