论文部分内容阅读
我国现有4种细粒土的液限试验方法。试验方法的不统一,对岩土工程实践带来很多不便。通过碟式仪法、76g圆锥仪(锥角30°,沉入土中10mm)和76g圆锥仪(锥角30°,沉入土中17mm)等方法的对比试验,得出不同试验方法成果之间有良好的线性关系,可建立起大致相当的统计关系。在整合液限试验方法时,应立足国内,充分尊重国内积累的经验和资料,同时考虑与国际主流标准之间的衔接,并提出了相应的建议。
China’s existing four kinds of fine-grained soil liquid limit test method. The test method is not uniform, bringing a lot of inconvenience to the geotechnical engineering practice. Through the disc instrument method, 76g cone (cone angle 30 °, sinking into the soil 10mm) and 76g cone (cone angle 30 °, sinking into the soil 17mm) and other methods of comparison test, draw the results of different test methods There is a good linear relationship between, you can establish a roughly equivalent statistical relationship. In the integration of liquid limit test methods, we should be based in the country, fully respect the domestic experience and information accumulated, taking into account the convergence with the international mainstream standards, and put forward the corresponding recommendations.