论文部分内容阅读
1926年下半年处于党内合作阶段的国共两党对南中国迅猛发展的农民运动产生了巨大分歧。由于政治立场、价值观的不同,中共中央政治局委员、武汉国民政府农民部部长谭平山的一些做法在国民政府看来太左,但从联共(布)中央、共产国际看来太右,他勉为其难,但收效甚微。早在南昌起义前,共产国际就对谭平山表示不满,多次批评。谭平山是南昌起义的功臣,他参与了南昌起义的最初酝酿,最早联络贺龙;起草了南昌起义的宣言,并为宣言修改问题与张国焘进行了坚决斗争;出任公开的起义领导机构革命委员会的主要负责人;参与内部的革命三人小组、前委的领导与决策,最早高度评价南昌起义。但在南昌起义后谭平山不但未得表彰,反被开除党籍。斯大林关于中国革命的“三阶段”理论决定了谭平山在中国共产党内的政治生命。而谭平山在被开除出党后对斯大林“三阶段”理论提出的质疑有着合理的成分,也是他组织第三党的思想动因。
In the second half of 1926 the Kuomintang and the Communist Party at the stage of intra-Party cooperation had a huge disagreement with the rapidly developing peasant movement in southern China. Due to differences in politics and values, Tan Pingshan, member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee and peasant minister of the Wuhan National Government, appears too far to the KMT government but appears to be far from the Central Committee of the Communist Party (CCP) and the Comintern. He Reluctantly, but with little success. As early as before the Nanchang Uprising, Comintern expressed dissatisfaction with Tan Pingshan repeatedly criticized. Tan Pingshan was a hero of the Nanchang Uprising. He was involved in the initial deliberation of the Nanchang Uprising and was the earliest to contact He Long. He drafted the Nanchang Uprising declaration and held a resolute struggle against Zhang Guotao for the revision of the declaration. He was the chief representative of the revolutionary committee of the revolutionary uprising agency Responsible person; participate in the internal tripartite revolutionary group, the leadership and decision-making, the earliest high praise Nanchang Uprising. However, after the uprising in Nanchang, Tan Pingshan not only failed to be commended, but was expelled from the party. Stalin’s “Three Phases” Theory on the Chinese Revolution Determined Tan Pingshan’s Political Life in the Chinese Communist Party. However, Tan Ping-shan’s justification for his questioning of Stalin’s “three-stage” theory after being expelled from the Party is also the motive for his organization of the third party.