论文部分内容阅读
【目的】探讨综合指数法和h系列指数法在期刊核心作者测评方面的异同。【方法】统计2010—2015年在《编辑学报》上发表的文章及其作者,利用综合指数和h系列指数测定《编辑学报》的核心作者,并对不同方法测评排序结果进行描述性分析和相关性研究。【结果】由综合指数和h指数测评的《编辑学报》2010—2015年的核心作者均有22位;但由于计算方法不同,各种指数的评测结果存在差异。【结论】综合指数区分度较高,可有效测评期刊的核心作者;h指数在期刊作者的测评上,缺乏区分度,需要和hm指数结合起来使用。综合指数与标准化h指数之间不存在相关关系,与h指数和hm指数相关性显著,呈线性相关。
【Objective】 To explore the similarities and differences between the comprehensive index method and the h-series index method in evaluating the core authors of journals. 【Method】 Statistics articles and authors published in Journal of Editorials from 2010 to 2015 were used to determine the core authors of the Editorial Journal using the composite index and h-series index, and the descriptive analysis and correlation of the ranking results of different methods Sexual research. 【Result】 The authors of “Editorial Journal” from 2010 to 2015, both evaluated by the composite index and the h index, have 22 core authors. However, due to different calculation methods, there are differences in the evaluation results of various indices. 【Conclusion】 The higher index of comprehensive index can effectively evaluate the core author of journal. The index of h is lack of discrimination in the evaluation of periodical authors and needs to be combined with hm index. There is no correlation between the composite index and the standardized h index, which is linearly related to h index and hm index.