论文部分内容阅读
我国环境法学界大多从环境民事责任形式角度论述排除危害。然而,由于环境危害有公益危害和私益危害之区别,制度上理应有排除危害类公益诉讼与排除侵害类私益诉讼之划分。排除危害类公益诉讼的理论基础在于良好环境权的公法保护理念与法院司法审查角色拓展和职能限制理论。决策者应以上述理论为基础,综合考量我国现实状况,将排除危害类公益诉讼制度适用范围从环境污染类危害扩展到生态破坏类危害领域,并设计正当的诉讼程序和合理的裁判方法。
Most of China’s environmental law scholars from the perspective of environmental civil liability form the exclusion of hazards. However, due to the difference between public hazard and private hazard, the system should have the classification of harmful public interest litigation and excluding the infringement class private interest litigation. The theoretical basis for excluding public interest litigation of harm type lies in the concept of public law protection of good environmental rights and the theory of role limitation and function restriction of court judicial review. Based on the above theories, decision-makers should consider the reality of our country comprehensively, extend the scope of application of the system of public interest litigation excluding hazards from the hazard of environmental pollution to the field of ecological damage, and design proper litigation procedures and reasonable refereeing methods.