论文部分内容阅读
检察官客观义务是未来检察权研究中不可或缺的内容。各国对检察官客观义务的制度规定基本特点是虚实结合,以虚为主。在我国,通常的研究思路是立法赋予检察官大量具体的客观义务。而在司法实践中,由于主客观环境限制,不少相关法律条款往往难以落实。从长远来看,应当对我国检察官客观义务的立法思路进行调整,将其从务实转变为务虚,这样并不会降低检察官客观义务在检察权理论中的重要地位。
The procurator’s objective obligation is an indispensable part of the research on prosecutorial power in the future. The basic characteristic of the system stipulations of the obligees’ objective obligations in various countries is the combination of the actual situation and the actual situation. In our country, the usual research idea is that legislation gives prosecutors a large number of specific objective obligations. In judicial practice, due to the subjective and objective environmental constraints, many relevant legal provisions are often difficult to implement. In the long run, we should make adjustments to the legislative ideas on the objective obligations of procurators in our country and change them from pragmatism to retreat. This will not reduce the important position of procurators’ objective obligations in the procuratorial power theory.