南帆老师谈到由驻校作家来指导写作课程,这一点我十分赞同。但我想进一步澄清的是:中文系、或者说大学,为什么要教授写作?而作家又为什么一定要学习写作、乃至文学史文学理论等学术知识?在我身处的大学,每一届中文系都有几个“写作型”学生,但他们与自己的课业常常形成一种令人遗憾的关系:老师和学生,学术和写作,各走各路。这是教育者的缺陷,对于学生来说更是莫大的损失,因为一个把自己和知识对立起来的作家,一个视文学史为故纸堆、视理论和批评为跟屁虫只相信一己之才思的作家,几乎没机 I am very much in agreement with Teacher Nan Fan’s talk about the writer’s instruction in writing courses. But I would like to clarify further: Chinese Department, or university, why teach writing? And why writers must learn writing, literary history and literary theory and other academic knowledge? In my college, every session of the Chinese There are a few “writing” students who often form a regrettable relationship with their homework: teachers and students, academics and writing, each walking its own way. This is a flaw for educators, which is even more devastating to students because a writer who confronts himself with knowledge, a writer who views literary history as a pile of paper, theory of sight, and criticism of a genius who only believes in pet bees, No machine