论文部分内容阅读
行政证据的合法性与否对于行政诉讼而言有着不可或缺的意义,在行政诉讼中,行政证据形成于行政机关行使行政职权的过程中,证据合法性与否不仅需满足证据的基本属性,对于行政诉讼的自身的特点而言,证据的形式、行政主体的合法性以及行政程序的合法性均需审查,同时对于违法的证据,完全排除还是经补正修复可以作为证据使用,对于整个诉讼活动而言有着重要意义。本文主要从行政证据的合法性审查规则出发,从行政证据作出的主体、行政证据的收集程序以及合法证据的形式三方面进行证据合法性审查规则的正面阐释,同时从非法证据排除规则的角度将不符合法律规定的证据分析应否进行排除适用。
The legitimacy of administrative evidence has indispensable significance for administrative litigation. In administrative litigation, administrative evidence is formed in the process of administrative authority exercising administrative authority. The legitimacy of evidence not only satisfies the basic attributes of evidence, For the characteristics of administrative litigation, the form of evidence, the legitimacy of administrative body and the legitimacy of administrative procedures need to be examined. At the same time, the complete exclusion of evidence of illegal act or the remedial repair can be used as evidence. For the entire litigation activity In terms of words of great significance. This article mainly from the legality of the administrative evidence review rules, from the administrative evidence made by the main body, the collection of administrative evidence as well as the legal form of evidence to verify the validity of the three rules positive review, at the same time from the perspective of the rule of illegal evidence exclusion will rule Evidence analysis that does not comply with the law should be excluded.