论文部分内容阅读
目的分析三种根充糊剂应用于根尖周炎患者的疗效。方法将我院就诊的牙根尖周炎患者150例随机分成Vitapex糊剂组(A组)、AH-plus糊剂组(B组)和碧兰糊剂组(C组)各50例,对比三组疗效。结果相比于A组,B、C组患者于治疗后2d、4d、7d疼痛更轻,患者对治疗的满意度也更高;C组远期疗效及患者满意度比其他两组都好,组间差异有统计学意义。结论 AH-plus糊剂与碧兰糊剂对根尖周炎患者的短期疗效较好,碧兰糊剂的远期疗效和患者满意度更佳。
Objective To analyze the curative effect of three kinds of root filling paste in patients with periapical periodontitis. Methods 150 patients with periapical periodontitis treated in our hospital were randomly divided into Vitapex paste group (A group), AH-plus paste group (B group) and Bilan paste group (C group) Group efficacy. Results Compared with patients in group A, patients in groups B and C had less pain at 2d, 4d and 7d after treatment, and the patients were more satisfied with the treatment. The long-term efficacy and patient satisfaction in group C were better than the other two groups, The difference between the groups was statistically significant. Conclusions The short-term curative effect of AH-plus paste and Bilan paste on periapical periodontitis patients is better, and the long-term curative effect and patients’ satisfaction of Birao paste are better.