建筑学术思想,是社会思潮的一面镜子,是建筑活动的灵魂和导向仪。中国自古有匠师、工匠、而没有建筑师。工匠的技艺靠师傅或袭祖,嫡派相传,循规蹈矩;偶有改进也极微弱,形不成流派,更激不起“思潮”。不分南北,不论东西,都供奉着一位祖师爷——鲁班。学术上的见解相差不大极易调合。所以,中国传统建筑秦汉之时已臻成热,唐宋之季已达极盛,沿袭至明清,仍无多大进化。学术思想上无大起大落的变化,或缺少认真的学术争辩,则很难促进这一学科的发展。而西方的建筑随历史的演进而激烈地变化。从古典柱式到中世纪的穹顶从哥特建筑到文艺复兴,从 Architectural academic thought is a mirror of social trends of thought. It is the soul and guiding instrument of architectural activities. China has craftsmen, artisans, and no architects since ancient times. The art of craftsmanship depends on the master or the ancestral ancestors. The ancestors send rumors and follow the rules; occasional improvements are also extremely weak, and they are not genre schools. No matter what the north or the south, no matter what things, are dedicated to a father-in-law Luban. There is not much difference in academic opinion and it is very easy to blend. Therefore, the time of the traditional Chinese architecture of the Qin and Han Dynasties has become very hot, and the Tang and Song Dynasties have reached a very high level. Following the Ming and Qing Dynasties, there was still little evolution. There is no significant ups and downs in academic thinking, or a lack of serious academic debate, it is difficult to promote the development of this discipline. Western architecture has changed drastically with the evolution of history. From classical columns to medieval domes from Gothic architecture to the Renaissance, from