论文部分内容阅读
中间禁令是一种衡平法临时救济措施,用于紧急情况下救济受损权利,和在正式庭审前保持未决事项原状。新西兰各级法院规则有关中间禁令的内容限于程序性规定,法官审查中间禁令申请则遵从司法先例确定的三个步骤。我国行为保全措施与新西兰中间禁令制度功能相同,程序设计相似,然而,二者在申请人证据披露义务、审理模式和法官自由裁量权限三个方面存在的差异,反映出两国在制度构建思路和理念存在深层差异。
The interim injunction is a temporary relief of equitable relief for the relief of the right to an emergency in an emergency and to maintain the status quo pending before the formal hearing. New Zealand’s rules of court at all levels of interlocutory injunctions are procedural requirements and judges review interlocutory injunctions in three steps as determined by the judicial precedent. However, the differences between the two in terms of the applicant’s obligation of disclosure of evidence, the mode of trial and the discretion of judges reflect the differences between the two countries in terms of system construction and There are deep differences in philosophy.