论文部分内容阅读
近些年来，在中国近代史研究中，出现了一些值得注意的倾向：有些论者把今天中国的现代化等同于历史上畸形的＂近代化＂，并进而以现实去阐释、比附历史，从而肯定了不该肯定的外来侵略者的＂功劳＂；有些论者的＂创新＂不是为了求真，而是靠孤立的、片面的事实去论人评史，从而违背了历史真实，有意无意地抬高了袁世凯一类历史人物；有些论者在研究辛亥革命等历史事件时，不从历史客观实际出发，而是以主观臆想去另行设计一套历史进程的方案，制造一种革命不如改良的＂理论＂，从而自觉不自觉地混淆了视听，亵渎了历史。这类不良倾向，已引起一切严肃史学工作者的关注，相信通过辨析，会还历史以本来面目。
In recent years, there have been some noteworthy tendencies in the study of Chinese modern history: some writers have equated today’s China’s modernization with an anachronistic “modernization” in history, and then explained it in reality, attaching it to history and thus affirming The “merits and demerits” of foreign invaders who should not be affirmed; some “innovations” of the theory are not based on truth-seeking but on isolated and one-sided facts, thus violating the truth of history and unintentionally or unconsciously carrying In the historical research of the 1911 Revolution, some theorists did not proceed from the objective reality of history, but designed a set of historical process separately with subjective imagination to create a kind of “ Theory ”, thus consciously or unconsciously confused audio-visual, profane history. Such unhealthy tendencies have drawn the attention of all serious historians. I believe that through analysis, history will still be true.