论文部分内容阅读
虽然对每个在建设领域从事经营活动的人或从事建设市场监管工作的人来说,“挂靠”这个词并不陌生,但“挂靠”从来就没有正式成为一个有明确定义的法律概念。“挂靠”只是我们对其面熟的相关行为的简称或通俗说法而已。我们认为,建设领域的“挂靠”就是作为承包人的一方市场主体,使用其他承包人(主要是法人单位)的名义或者允许其他承包人(包括法人单位和自然人个人)使用自己名义承揽业务的行为。如果每个市场主体在承揽业务中都只使用自己的名义,就没有“挂靠”现象的发生。“挂靠”现象之发生,从形式上看,就是一方使用他方名义,或者允许其他方使用自己的名义。我们前面对《建筑法》相关条文进行评注时指出,《建筑法》应当将打击“挂靠”的范围限定为“欺
Although the term ”anchored“ is not unfamiliar to every person engaged in business activities in the field of construction or engaged in the construction of market supervision, ”anchoring“ has never formally become a clearly defined Law concept. ”Anchored “ is just our shorthand or popular saying about the familiar behavior. In our opinion, ”anchoring “ in the field of construction refers to the market as one of the contractors, using the name of other contractors (mainly legal person units) or allowing other contractors (including legal entities and natural persons) to use their own name for contractual services the behavior of. If each market body in the contract business only use their own name, there is no ”anchored “ phenomenon. ”Anchored “ phenomenon occurs, formally, is one party to use the other party’s name, or allow other parties to use their own name. When we commented on the relevant provisions of the ”Building Law“ earlier, we pointed out that the ”Construction Law“ should limit the scope of the ”strike“ to ”bullying"