《保险法》第17条的机制缺失与救济调整

来源 :浙江学刊 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:xiaohe1025
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
为救济保险人与投保人之间存在的保险格式条款信息不对称,我国现行保险法明确对保险人课以说明义务。立法意在保障投保人的知情权,推动保险格式条款的解释信息向投保人流动。但说明义务的规定缺失有效的实施机制,容易导致说明义务形式化,缔约环节存在的信息不对称并未有效缓解。保险格式条款缔约信息不对称的有效救济,思路上应从法律制度建构入手,路径上,应着眼于保障投保人缔约选择权,以保障投保人辨识和衡量保险格式条款所需要的时间和知识为方向。 As the asymmetric information about the insurance terms and conditions existing between the relief insurer and the policy holder, the current insurance law in our country explicitly states the insurer. Legislation is intended to protect the insured’s right to information and promote the interpretation of the terms of the insurance scheme to the policyholders. However, the lack of an effective implementation mechanism for the stipulation of obligations and obligations can easily lead to the formalization of the obligation of explanation and the asymmetry of information existing in the contracting party has not been effectively alleviated. Insurance format clauses Contracting information effective relief, the idea should start from the construction of the legal system, the path should focus on ensuring the insured contracting options to protect the insured to identify and measure the terms and conditions of the insurance policy the time and knowledge required .
其他文献
中国传统的哲学思想和伦理思想,发展到宋代逐步形成了以理学为特点的思想形态。史称“北宋五子”的学术思想,虽各有自己的学科特色,但都致力于把本体论和伦理学结合起来,创立
本文通过对荣华二采区10
期刊
方法论的变革意味着学术创新,对于二十一世纪的词学,方法论依然是一个首要命题。对于词学方法论的探讨,不应当仅仅局限于词学研究具体方法的“技艺”层面的探讨,还应当是基于