论文部分内容阅读
態範疇為羌語支語言所共有的動詞範躊,一般認為羌語支語言的態範疇有二:一為自動及使動態;二則為互動態。西夏語既屬羌語的一支,照理來說應該有態範疇,而且應該有相類似的語法表達形式。在本文中筆者以羌語支語言表達該範疇的語法手段作為參考基點,並輔以分布分析法對西夏語的態範疇進行分析研究,試圖突破西夏文字的限侑及譯語的影響。分析結果顯示,西夏語的態範疇中只有自動態和使動態的對立,而互動態並不存在,因為其表達方式並不是藉由語法手段,而是句法及詞彙手段。至於自動及使動態,則可由詞根屈折及分析形式來表示,其中分析形式就像其他的羌語支語言一樣是較具能產性的。此外,西夏語的詞根屈折類別也較其他羌語支語言複雜。西夏語的使動結構為:致使者(causer)+被使役者(casuee)(蒙事者/目標/丑1属1
State categories are common to the Qiang language branch verb paradox, it is generally believed that the Qiang language branch has two categories of state: one for the dynamic and the dynamic; two interactive. Xixia language is not only a Qiang language, according to reason should have state category, and should have a similar form of grammatical expression. In this paper, the author uses the grammatical means of the Qiang language as the reference point, supplemented by the distributed analysis method to analyze the state categories of the Xixia language, trying to break through the limitations of the Xixia language and the influence of the target language. The analysis shows that there are only autonomic and dynamic antagonisms in the state categories of Xixia language, while the interactive states do not exist because their expressions are not by grammatical means but by syntactic and lexical means. As for the automatic and dynamic, it can be expressed in terms of root inflection and analysis, in which the analysis form is as productive as other QNL languages. In addition, the root of the Xixia language inflection category than other Qiang language support complex. The motivational structure of Xixia language is: causer + casuee (dementia / target / ugly 1 genus 1