Comparison of GTN Damage Models for Sheet Metal Forming

来源 :Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:shayuer
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
The Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman(GTN) damage model was developed basing on anisotropic yield criterion to predict the damage evolution for anisotropic voided ductile materials.Hill’s quadratic anisotropic yield criterion(1948) and Barlat’s 3-component anisotropic yield criterion(1989) were used to describe the anisotropy of the matrix.User defined subroutines were developed using the above models.Taking the benchmark of NUMISHEET’93 square cup deep drawing as an example, the effect of matrix plastic anisotropy on a ductile material was studied.The predicted result by Barlat’89-GTN model has a better agreement with the experimental data than that by Hill’48-GTN and the original GTN model. The Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) damage model was developed basing on anisotropic yield criterion to predict the damage evolution for anisotropic voided ductile materials. Hill’s quadratic anisotropic yield criterion (1948) and Barlat’s 3-component anisotropic yield criterion (1989) were used to describe the anisotropy of the matrix. User defined subroutines were developed using the above models. Making the benchmark of NUMISHEET’93 square cup deep drawing as an example, the effect of matrix plastic anisotropy on a ductile material was studied. The predicted result by Barlat’89-GTN model has a better agreement with the experimental data than that by Hill’48-GTN and the original GTN model.
其他文献