论文部分内容阅读
法学界对学术评价机制进行了诸多探索,成果丰富;但片面强调引用数或发文量,需要升级评价指数。H指数方兴未艾,其合理性在于综合评价学者的产出是否“又好又快”。对法学界345位候选人以2014年8月底为时间点进行中国知网论文H指数统计后,得出了100位高指数作者进行各个二级学科和整个一级学科的各项分析,展现了诸多“很有意思甚至非常深刻的学术结论”。未来中国法学的学术评价机制应当以H指数为基础,对内结合核心产出量,在外结合同行评价,不断优化。
The academic circles carried out many explorations on the academic evaluation mechanism with rich achievements; however, it is necessary to upgrade the evaluation index in order to emphasize the number of quotations or the amount of quotations unilaterally. H index is rising, its rationality lies in the comprehensive evaluation of scholars output is “good and fast ”. Based on the H index statistics of 345 Chinese essay papers from 345 candidates in the legal field at the time of the end of August, 2014, we obtained 100 high index authors’ analyzes of all the second-level disciplines and the whole first-level disciplines, A lot of “very interesting or very profound academic conclusions ”. In the future, the academic evaluation mechanism of Chinese law should be based on the H index, and be optimized internally with the combination of core output and external evaluation.