抗病毒颗粒治疗流行性感冒有效性和安全性的多中心随机对照研究

来源 :中华医学杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:a13600660175
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察抗病毒颗粒治疗流行性感冒的有效性及安全性。方法:采用多中心、随机、双盲双模拟、阳性药平行对照试验设计,在中国27家三级甲等医院筛选流行性感冒患者,按1∶1随机分配至抗病毒颗粒试验组或磷酸奥司他韦胶囊对照组,每组计划入组受试者200例。试验组给予抗病毒颗粒(每次18 g,每日3次)及磷酸奥司他韦模拟剂口服,对照组给予磷酸奥司他韦胶囊(每次75 mg,每日2次)及抗病毒颗粒模拟剂口服,疗程均为5 d。主要疗效指标包括临床主要症状缓解时间和完全退热时间。次要疗效指标包括对乙酰氨基酚使用剂量、中医证候积分改变、其他重要临床症状缓解时间。对比抗病毒颗粒试验组和磷酸奥司他韦对照组疗效指标差异,同时监测不良事件或不良反应评估抗病毒颗粒的安全性。结果:共入组受试者393例,抗病毒颗粒试验组195例,完成试验191例(97.95%)。磷酸奥司他韦对照组198例,完成试验195例(98.48%),两组脱落率和剔除率差异无统计学意义(n P>0.05)。全分析数据集(FAS)中试验组年龄(34.9±14.4)岁,男性83例(42.78%);对照组年龄(33.3±13.5)岁,男性78例(39.59%)。两组受试者人口学资料、体格检查、病毒病原学检测、基线中医证候总分及各单项症状评分等比较差异均无统计学意义(n P>0.05)。FAS中试验组临床主要症状缓解时间n M(n Q1,n Q3)为3.0(3.0,4.0) d,对照组为3.0(3.0,4.0)d,差异无统计学意义(n P>0.05)。完全退热时间n M(n Q1,n Q3)试验组为34.0(20.3,49.0) h,对照组为36.5(19.6,48.8) h,差异无统计学意义(n P>0.05)。抗病毒颗粒在对乙酰氨基酚使用剂量、中医证候疗效、多数重要临床症状消失率等方面与磷酸奥司他韦胶囊疗效相当(n P>0.05),且抗病毒颗粒组第3天的头昏、胸闷症状消失率优于磷酸奥司他韦胶囊组(n P0.05). In the Full Analysis Set (FAS), the mean age of the experimental group was (34.9±14.4) years old, with 83 males (42.78%). The mean age of the control group was (33.3±13.5) years old, with 78 males (39.59%). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in demographic data, physical examination, viral pathogen detection, total score of TCM syndromes and scores of each symptom at baseline (n P>0.05). In the FAS, the remission timen M(n Q1, Q3) of major clinical symptoms was 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) days in the experimental group and 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) days in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (n P>0.05). The timen M(n Q1, Q3) of complete defervescence was 34.0 (20.3, 49.0) hours in the experimental group and 36.5 (19.6, 48.8) hours in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (n P>0.05). KBD granules had the same effect as Oseltamivir phosphate capsule (n P>0.05) in terms of acetaminophen dosage, TCM syndrome effect and disappearance rate of most important clinical symptoms. Meanwhile, the disappearance rate of dizziness and chest distress on day 3 in the KBD granules group was better than that of oseltamivir phosphate capsule (n P<0.05).n Conclusion:KBD granules have the same efficacy as Oseltamivir Phosphate capsule in the treatment of influenza and the drug safety is good.
其他文献