论文部分内容阅读
仲裁裁决撤销制度的存在及运转对于当事人、司法系统及仲裁系统三方都颇具意义。关于仲裁裁决撤销权的归属,“裁决地标准”——“裁决地标准+准据法标准”——“仲裁地标准”的发展并不应当被简单地识别为对“准据法标准”的“抛弃”。当下,在形式上“准据法标准”虽然隐去了,但其所蕴含的理念却被“仲裁地标准”彻底地继承了。就撤销裁决的理由而言,结合仲裁制度在我国所处的实际环境,应以“程序性错误+实体性错误”为原则,并允许当事人达成合意排除法院对实体性错误的审查权。
The existence and operation of the arbitration ruling revocation system is of great significance to the parties, the judicial system and the arbitration system. With respect to the vesting of the arbitration award, the development of the arbitration award should not be simply identified as a violation of the “arbitration ground standard” “According to the standard” “Abandonment ”. At present, in the form of “standard of law ” although hidden, but its concept is “arbitration standards ” completely inherited. As for the reason of revoking the arbitration, combining with the actual environment where the arbitration system is located in our country, the principle of “procedural error + substantive error” should be adopted and the parties should be allowed to reach the agreement of excluding the court from reviewing the substantive error.