论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨优质护理服务对负压封闭引流术(VSD)患者康复的影响。方法选取2012年7月至2014年10月该科收治进行VSD引流术的患者42例作为对照组,同时选取2014年11月至2016年12月该科收治进行VSD引流术患者43例作为观察组。对照组患者进行常规模式护理,而观察组患者在对照组治疗基础上再加用优质护理服务,比较两组患者并发症发生情况、患者满意度及护理的总有效率。结果观察组患者护理总有效率[46.5%(20/43)]明显高于对照组[33.3%(14/42)],差异有统计学意义(χ~2=12.79,P<0.05);对照组患者发生并发症8例(19.05%),观察组并发症发生仅1例(2.33%),两组并发症发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=11.59,P<0.05)。对照组患者中不满意16例,满意26例,观察组中不满意4例,满意39例,两组满意度比较,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=10.98,P<0.05)。结论优质护理服务对VSD有利于患者康复,值得在临床推广应用。
Objective To investigate the effect of quality nursing service on the rehabilitation of patients with vacuum closed drainage (VSD). Methods Forty-two patients undergoing VSD drainage in our department from July 2012 to October 2014 were selected as the control group. Forty-three patients undergoing VSD drainage from November 2014 to December 2016 were selected as the observation group . Patients in the control group were given routine care. Patients in the observation group were given quality nursing care based on the control group. The complication, patient satisfaction and total effective rate of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of nursing in observation group was significantly higher than that of control group [46.5% (20/43)] [33.3% (14/42)], the difference was statistically significant (χ ~ 2 = 12.79, P <0.05) There were 8 cases (19.05%) in the group and 1 case (2.33%) in the observation group. There was significant difference in the complication rates between the two groups (χ ~ 2 = 11.59, P <0.05). There were 16 unsatisfactory patients in the control group, 26 satisfied patients, 4 unsatisfied patients in the observation group and 39 satisfied patients. The satisfaction of the two groups was statistically significant (χ ~ 2 = 10.98, P <0.05). Conclusion High quality nursing service is beneficial to patients’ rehabilitation in VSD, and it is worth popularizing and applying in clinic.