论文部分内容阅读
多余指定原则,在司法实践中多次被运用,但一直存在争议。在我国,这一原则与必要技术特征,没有本质的不同。必要技术特征是指发明或者实用新型为达到其目的和效果所不可缺少的,其足以构成发明或者实用新型主题,使之区别于其他技术方案的技术特征。本文从司法案例入手,基于公平原则,分析多余指定原则对权利人保护的必要性和重要性。
The principle of redundant designation has been used many times in judicial practice, but it has always been controversial. In our country, there is no essential difference between this principle and the necessary technical features. Necessary technical characteristics means that the invention or utility model is indispensable for achieving its purpose and effect, and it is enough to make the subject of the invention or utility model different from the technical features of other technical solutions. Based on the principle of fairness, this article starts with the judicial cases and analyzes the necessity and importance of the principle of redundant assignment to the protection of the obligee.