论文部分内容阅读
登记是物权变动的公示方法,当事人的意思起决定性作用。登记机构形式上审查登记申请材料,不能确保物权变动的真实性和有效性。当事人提交虚假材料导致物权登记错误,本质上属于民事争议,应当通过民事诉讼解决。“先民后行”“先行后民”和“一并审理”都不是解决问题的最佳方案。随着社会的转型,国家权力要进行再分配,立法权引导改革,行政权退出不该管、管不好的领域,司法权更多地参与国家治理。《不动产登记条例》是物权法的程序法,应当明确规定登记同意原则。因登记申请人的原因造成物权登记错误,登记簿记载的权利人不同意更正登记,应当秉承私法救济的理念。权利义务实际影响条款应当作为排除行政诉讼受案范围的第五种事由,将有限的行政诉讼资源用在真正解决行政争议上。
Registration is a method of publicity of changes in property rights, the meaning of the parties play a decisive role. The examination of registration application form by registration authority can not ensure the authenticity and validity of the change of real right. False materials submitted by the parties resulting property registration errors, in essence, belong to civil disputes, should be resolved through civil proceedings. “Ancestors in the back ” “” after the people “and ” together “are not the best solution to the problem. With the social transformation, state power should be redistributed, legislative power should lead to reform, executive power should not be out of control, and areas with poor management should be taken. Judicial power should be more involved in state governance. ”Real Estate Registration Ordinance" is the procedural law of property law, it should clearly define the principle of registration of consent. Due to the registration of the applicant for the property registration errors caused by the registration of the right holders do not agree to correct registration, should uphold the concept of private law relief. The actual impact of the rights and obligations provisions should be excluded as the fifth reason for the scope of the administrative proceedings, the limited administrative litigation resources used to solve real administrative disputes.