关于尧出生地的争论,既是古史诸多起源地之争的一部分,又是关乎中国传统文化根之所在的关键性问题。文献研究的结果证明,“尧出生高邮”新说立论的文献证据实际只有一种;作为证据的四句话中,只有一句话可以立论,却也没有关联记载;以《今本竹书纪年》为主要依据讨论尧出生地不具备科学性;故不能成立。 The controversy over Yao’s birthplace is not only part of the dispute over many places of origin in ancient history, but also a crucial issue concerning the root of traditional Chinese culture. The results of the literature research prove that there is only one documentary evidence of “Yao’s birth Gaoyou” and “new theory of argument”. Only one of the four sentences as evidence can be set forth and there is no related record; Chronology "as the main basis for discussion Yao’s birthplace is not scientific; it can not be established.