目的探讨和分析护理干预在胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术围手术期的应用效果。方法在2015年2月至2017年2月广西医科大学第四附属医院收治的所有行胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术患者中选取156例作为本次研究的观察对象。根据不同的护理方法,将156例患者随机分为2组,每组各78例,分别记为观察组和对照组。2组患者均给予胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术,其中观察组患者给予综合护理干预,对照组患者给予常规护理。比较2组患者的手术治疗情况、不良反应发生率和护理满意度。结果观察组患者的手术治疗情况明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的不良反应发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的护理满意度明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论综合护理干预的应用可以明显提高胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术的治疗效果和护理满意度,减少不良反应的发生率。 Objective To investigate and analyze the effect of nursing intervention in the perioperative period of endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods From February 2015 to February 2017, 156 cases of endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm were selected in the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University as the object of this study. According to different nursing methods, 156 patients were randomly divided into two groups, each of 78 cases, respectively, recorded as the observation group and control group. Both groups were given endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The patients in the observation group were given comprehensive nursing intervention and the control group were given routine care. Surgical treatment, incidence of adverse reactions and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The surgical treatment of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The application of comprehensive nursing intervention can significantly improve the therapeutic effect and nursing satisfaction of endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.