论文部分内容阅读
海德格尔朝向另一开端之思想通道可简示为Sein→Seyn→:他一开始要去思的就是Sein(存在),Sein是用来与象征第一开端即形而上学的Seiendes(存在者)划清界线的;Seyn(存有)则是用来表示他所要思的Sein是不再被形而上学地思考的Sein本身;而上面的叉不仅直观且彻底地删掉了任何可能为第一开端所占用的Sein,更重要的是它还原撑起了四个世界地带映射-游戏的原始时-空,惟如此另一开端即本有之思才得以被通达。海氏Sein→Seyn→的存在之旅,一方面是要严格区分两个开端,他要与第一开端决断开;另一方面则是要去原撑开从第一开端转渡到另一开端的原始时-空通道。我们把该通道喻为海氏虫洞。该虫洞真的能如期将我们救渡到另一开端吗?本文将尝试一种可能的探讨。
Heidegger’s path of thought towards another beginning can be described as Sein → Seyn →: Sein is the first thing he wants to think about, and Sein is used to refer to Seiendes (existence), the symbol of the first metaphysics Seyn (existence) is used to indicate that he is thinking of Sein is no longer metaphysical thinking of Sein itself; and the fork above not only intuitively and completely deleted any may be occupied for the first Sein, but more importantly, it restores the four world map of the world - the game’s original time - empty, but so another start that is able to be accessible. His Sein → Seyn → journey, on the one hand, is to strictly distinguish between the two beginnings, and he must decide on the first occasion; on the other hand, he should go to the original transition from the first one to the other one The original time - empty channel. We call this passage a sea wormhole. Will the wormhole really save us to another start? This article will try one possible discussion.