论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较分析水囊压迫与纱布填塞对剖宫产术中大出血的治疗效果。方法:分析2013年1月至2015年1月该院收诊的剖宫产术中大出血患者共120例,将其随机分为观察组和对照组各60例,观察组采用水囊压迫止血,对照组采用纱布填塞止血。记录两组患者24 h出血情况、手术时间、留置物时间比较两种止血方法的临床治疗情况。结果:治疗后两组患者出血情况均得到一定缓解。在对患者手术时间以及留置填塞物进行比较方面,观察组患者手术时间明显短于对照组患者,填塞物数量也少于对照组(P<0.05)。对两组患者治疗效果进行对比,观察组患者效果明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:剖宫产术中,水囊压迫止血与纱布填塞止血有着同样的效果。此外,水囊压迫止血还可以有效缩短手术时间和留置物时间,临床效果较好,值得在临床上推广。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the curative effect of balloon compression and gauze packing on major bleeding in cesarean section. Methods: From January 2013 to January 2015, a total of 120 cases of major bleeding in cesarean section admitted to the hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were randomly divided into observation group (60 cases) and control group (60 cases) Control group gauze packing to stop bleeding. The 24 h bleeding, operation time and indwelling time of two groups were recorded to compare the clinical treatment of two hemostasis methods. Results: After treatment, the bleeding in both groups was relieved. Compared with the control group, the operation time of patients in the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P <0.05). The treatment effect of the two groups of patients were compared, the observation group was significantly better than the control group (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In cesarean section, the hydatidial compression hemostasis has the same effect as gauze packing. In addition, the hemostatic balloon compression can effectively shorten the operation time and lingering time, the clinical effect is better, it is worth in the clinical promotion.