论文部分内容阅读
近大半个世纪以来,围绕中国古史分期有过几次热烈争论,然至今众说纷纭,难获共识,原因之一,是“封建”等核心概念的厘定问题并未解决。20世纪30年代以后逐渐普被中国的泛化封建观,将秦至清的中国社会称为封建社会,这既脱离了“封建”的本义与西义,也有悖于马克思的封建社会原论。冯天瑜先生新著《“封建”考论》辨析泛化封建观,再探秦至清中国社会性质。四位学者就此一切关宏旨的议题展开讨论。
For nearly half a century, there have been several heated debates over the staging of ancient Chinese history. However, since there are divergent opinions and difficult consensus, one of the reasons is that the determination of the core concepts of “feudalism” has not been resolved. Since the 1930s, China gradually became the universal feudal concept and the Chinese society of the Qin and Qing Dynasties as the feudal society. This not only broke away from the original meaning of “feudalism” but also against the original theory of feudal society of Marx. Mr. Feng Tianyu ’s New Book on “The Textual Research of Feudalism” Discriminates the Generalization of Feudalism, and then on the Social Nature of Qin Zhiqing China. Four scholars discussed this issue of macroeconomic issues.