论文部分内容阅读
面对“全球化”的浪潮,如何加强中国文学批评的主体性,这是当前学术界思考的重要问题。其中,如何清理、分析和估价百年来中国文学批评的一系列基本概念与术语则可以说是这一理论问题的重要组成部分,我们只有对自己的理论的骨架与元素——概念体系作出新的审视与考察,才能够有效地说明我们已经走过的批评之路究竟是什么,其中又有着怎样的成就与问题,而这些概念体系所构成的理论大厦又在何种意义上是可靠的,在何种意义上又充满了锈迹甚至裂隙?总之,一个经过检查了的过去才是通向未来的坚实的基础。本期刊发的这一组笔谈是李怡教授目前正在发起的学术重估活动的重要组成部分,同时参与这一系列讨论的还有国内其他的学术刊物。
In the face of the tide of “globalization ”, how to strengthen the subjectivity of Chinese literary criticism is an important issue that the current academic circles think. Among them, how to clean up, analyze and evaluate a series of basic concepts and terms of Chinese literary criticism for a hundred years can be said to be an important part of this theoretical issue. Only by making a new study of the skeleton and element-concept system of our own theory Only by reviewing and examining can we effectively explain what the criticisms we have gone through and what kind of achievements and problems they have, and in what sense are theoretical mansions constructed by these conceptual systems in the In what sense is it full of rust or even cracks? In short, a checked past is a solid foundation for the future. This set of written paraphrases published in this issue is an important part of the academic revaluation activities currently being initiated by Prof. Li Yi. Other academic journals in China are also participating in this series of discussions.