论文部分内容阅读
鄭玄《六藝論》明確記載戴德編《大戴禮記》,其後學者意見不一,或認爲秦漢間人所撰,或認爲東漢禮學家所輯,或認爲後人僞輯。三種反對觀點或受思想局限的制約或源於對古籍認識不足,論述偏頗。贊同戴德編《大戴禮記》者論述雖多,惜未深挖其成書西漢戴德的證據。《大戴禮記》成書於西漢戴德的證據有六條:四條史料明確記載戴德編此書;相關篇章與出土文獻互證,說明其單篇早在戰國中期便已流傳,最晚流傳於漢宣帝五鳳三年;用字避西漢皇帝諱,最晚避宣帝諱,但不避東漢皇帝諱,說明成書於西漢宣帝後;從《投壺》、《保傅》兩篇引詩不屬於毛詩當屬於齊詩,毛詩盛行於東漢,齊詩行於西漢,看《大戴禮記》成書於西漢;與先秦和西漢文獻重見者多,與東漢文獻重見者少,說明其成書於西漢;本身存留編選痕迹,編選內容符合太傅身份。劉向、劉歆、班固三人曾親見過《大戴禮記》,但其《別録》、《七略》、《漢書·藝文志》均不著録,之所以不著録不是因爲《大戴禮記》非西漢戴德所編,而是有其他多重原因,如其資料彙編的叢書性質,劉向、劉歆習詩學派與戴德不同,劉向、劉歆對禮經、禮記認識與戴德不同,班固繼承劉向、劉歆著録傳統及其東漢時仍不受重視地位較低等。通過正反兩方面的詳細論證,《大戴禮記》爲西漢戴德所編,不容置疑。《大戴禮記》是戴德擔任信都王劉興太傅期間所編纂的教材,其編纂特徵有三:一是以教學爲宗旨,二是增廣擴充的編纂方式,三是替换字詞的處理原則。
Zheng Xuan’s “Six Arts Theory” clearly describes Dade’s “Dai Dai Li Ji”. Later, scholars disagree, or think that the Qin and Han dynasties made, or that the Eastern Han Dynasty scholars compiled, or that posterity pseudo-series. Three objections or restricted by the ideological constraints or from lack of understanding of the ancient books, discusses biased. Agree with Dade, “Dai Dai Li Ji,” although many expositions, but unfortunately did not dig their evidence of the West Ham. There are six pieces of evidence that Da Dai Li Ji was written in the Western Han dynasty: four pieces of historical material clearly contain the book compiled by Dade; the related chapters and the unearthed documents are mutually proofed, indicating that their single articles were already circulated as early as the mid-Warring States period and the latest was circulated In the Han Xuan Emperor Wufeng three years; the word to avoid Western Han Dynasty emperor Taboo, the latest to avoid the Xuan Emperor Taboo, but not taboo Emperor of the Eastern Han Dynasty, after the completion of Western Han Dynasty Xuan Dili; from the “cast pot”, “Paul Fu” Belonging to Mao Poems belong to Qi poetry, Mao poetry prevalent in the Eastern Han Dynasty, poetry line in the Western Han Dynasty, see the “Dai Dai Li Ji” into the Western Han Dynasty; and pre-Qin and Western Han literature more than those who see, The book in the Western Han Dynasty; itself retained editorial marks, compilation content in line with the identity of Taifu. Liu Xiang, Liu Xin and Ban Gu ever saw the “Dai Dai Li Ji” personally, but they did not record “Do not Record,” “Seven Lips,” “Han Shu Yi Wen Zhi” Dai Li Ji “is written by non-Western Han dynasty, but for other reasons, such as the nature of the compilation of information series, Liu Xiang and Liu Xin Xi Poetics are different from Dade, Liu Xiang and Liu Xin On the contrary, Ban Gu inherited Liu Xiang and Liu Xin did not pay much attention to tradition and the Eastern Han Dynasty. Pass both the pros and cons of the detailed argument, ”Dai Dai Li Ji" for the West Ham made, no doubt. Da Dai Li Ji is a textbook compiled by Dade during his tenure as a faithful to the king Liu Xing. Its compilation features three aspects: one is to teach for the purpose, the other is to expand and expand the way of compilation, the third is to replace the word processing principles.