论文部分内容阅读
目的比较鼻内镜下鼻腔泪囊造孔术与传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术的疗效。方法回顾分析136例慢性泪囊炎患者手术的效果,其中61例行鼻内镜下鼻腔泪囊造孔术(简称内镜组),75例行传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术(简称传统组)。结果鼻内镜组治愈27例,有效率93.1%,传统组治愈19例,有效率95%,P>0.05,两组比较差异无统计学意义。结论鼻内镜下鼻腔泪囊造孔术与传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术疗效相近,但鼻内镜下鼻腔泪囊造孔术创伤小,符合现代微创外科手术。
Objective To compare the efficacy of nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and conventional dacryocystorhinostomy. Methods Retrospective analysis of 136 cases of chronic dacryocystitis operation results, including 61 cases of nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (referred to as endoscopic group), 75 cases of conventional dacryocystorhinostomy (referred to as the traditional group). Results In endoscopic group, 27 cases were cured, the effective rate was 93.1%. The traditional group was cured in 19 cases, the effective rate was 95%, P> 0.05. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion Nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy is similar to traditional dacryocystorhinostomy. However, the nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy is less invasive and is in line with modern minimally invasive surgery.