论文部分内容阅读
为抵御共产主义理念所遭遇实证化的阐释误区,有学者提出应将马克思的共产主义观念定位于康德意义上的调节性理念。本文经过考察后认为,这一做法不可避免会导致如下“后果”:首先会消解掉马克思哲学探索社会现实总体这一根本主旨;其次会掩盖了马克思与康德对“人作为有限存在者”的理解差异;最后则抹煞了共产主义观念与康德调节性理念在“超越性(理想)”意涵上的不同。因此,马克思的共产主义观念并不能看作是康德意义上的调节性理念。
Some scholars have proposed that Marx’s concept of communism should be placed on the regulatory concept of Kantism in order to resist the misunderstanding of the empirical demonstration suffered by communist ideas. After the investigation, this paper argues that this approach inevitably leads to the following consequences: firstly, the fundamental thrust of Marxist philosophy in exploring the overall social reality will be eliminated; secondly, Marx and Kant will conceal the limitation of Marxism and Kant on the existence of human beings “And finally obliterated the difference between the conception of communism and the conception of Kant on the meaning of” transcendence (ideal) ". Therefore, Marx’s concept of communism can not be regarded as a regulatory concept in the sense of Kant.