论文部分内容阅读
本文是对梁启超中国史分期“三段论”说的论述。关于梁启超的中国史分期“三段论”———将中国历史划分为上世史、中世史、近世史的要点分析(包括内涵、划分标准、历史背景、实质)、形成的思想渊源以及得失的评价,是本文的重点内容,即第一部分。中国新史学先锋之一的夏曾佑的中国史分期、日本著名学者内藤湖南的中国史分期“三分法”均在不同程度上与梁氏分期说有着内在联系,以此为代表,展开论述梁启超中国史分期“三段论”的历史影响以及历史地位将成为本文的第二部分。
This article is a discussion of Liang Qichao’s “Syllogism” in Chinese staging. On the “Three Segment” of Liang Qichao’s Stages of Chinese History --- The Analysis of the Origin of Chinese History by Dividing Chinese History into Past-World History, Middle-World History and Recent-World History (Including Connotation, Standard of Division, Historical Background and Essence), Origin of Formation and Evaluation of Gains and Losses , Is the focus of this article, the first part. Xia Teng-woo, one of the pioneers of Chinese new historiography, and the “trichotomy” of the famous Chinese scholar Naoto’s history in China are all interlinked with Liang’s staging in varying degrees. On behalf of this, he started to discuss Liang Qichao China The historical impact and historical status of the “staged theory” of history will become the second part of this article.