论文部分内容阅读
20世纪 2 0年代社会主义在中国大陆与日本大为流行 ,当时处于日本统治之下的台湾受此影响 ,社会文化界研究谈论社会主义之风亦盛 ,并进而影响社会与政治运动的发展。 1 92 6年至 1 93 1年间以《台湾民报》及《台湾新民报》为战场 ,文化人陈逢源代表右派 ,求学中国大陆的许乃昌、蔡孝干 ,以及台湾社会文化运动的健将蒋渭水 (先右后左 )代表左派 ,在中国未来应该走社会主义抑或资本主义道路的问题上 ,曾有过延续数年的辩论 ,其中也涉及台湾的未来前途问题。这场论辩与台湾当时社会文化运动阵营内部的纷扰与分裂同时进行 ,厘清其经过与分析其时代意义 ,除了有助于理解台湾地区历史文化与中国大陆的互动之外 ,对思索中国当代历史进程 ,亦具启发参考价值。
Socialism in the 1920s greatly prevailed in China and Japan. Under the Japanese rule, Taiwan was affected by this. Social and cultural studies on socialism were also flourishing and thus affected the development of social and political movements. From 1996 to 1993, the Taiwan People’s Daily and the Taiwan’s Xinmin Daily were the battlegrounds. Cultural person Chen Fengyuan represented the right and Xu Naichang and Cai Hau-kao, who studied in mainland China, and Chiang Kai-shek, the elite of Taiwan’s social and cultural movement, Left) represents the left. In the course of whether China should take the path of socialism or capitalism in the future, there have been debates that have lasted for many years. This also involves the future of Taiwan. This argument is at the same time as the internal turmoil and division within the socio-cultural movement in Taiwan at that time. It is clarified that, after analyzing and analyzing its significance in the current era, apart from helping to understand the interaction between history and culture in Taiwan and mainland China, , But also inspired by the reference value.