康德的实践理性与阳明心学的致良知都十分关注主体道德自觉的建构 ,但路途却迥然有别。康德主张道德法则必须绝对地超越于经验实质 ,理性普遍立法越是纯粹、直接 ,道德的威慑力量越为庄严、崇高。而王阳明则强调吾心良知与天理、万物 ,与功夫实践相即相融 ,合一不二 ,致良知本于道德法则 ,却又不离人心物事。康德从理性本体分裂出经验现象 ,而王阳明则汇合超越与实质 ,实现理性形式、外在规范与日用实践、主体精神内在统一 ,要求由绝私堵己、省察克治而达到莹彻了然的绝对道德本体的境界 The practical reason of Kant and the conscience of Yangming psychology are very concerned about the construction of moral consciousness of the subject, but the journey is very different. Kant argues that the law of morality must absolutely surpass the essence of experience. The more general and rational the legislation is, the more pure and direct the deterrent force of morality is. And Wang Yangming emphasizes my heart of conscience and God, everything, and Kung Fu practice that blend, one of the best, to the conscience of the moral rules, but not leave the hearts of things. Kant seceded the empirical phenomenon from the rational ontology, while Wang Yangming merged the transcendence and essence, realized the rational form, the external norms and the daily practice, the inner unity of the subject spirit, the request from the absolute obscurity, The realm of absolute morality