论文部分内容阅读
目的:全科团队针对糖尿病患者进行强化生活方式指导干预治疗,并且对治疗效果进行观察。方法:首先随机选取本社区的140例二型糖尿病患者进行基本病症检查,按楼道进行分组,分别将病患分成传统治疗组别,以及强化生活方式干预治疗组别,每组病患人数70人。针对分组后的病患分别进行常规的药物治疗和强生生活方式干预观察手段,观察半年内的治疗过程,以及半年后的糖化血红蛋白达标(Hb A1c)情况。结果:满意为Hb A1c=≤6.5%,一般为Hb A1c=6.5~7.5%,无效为Hb A1c≥7.6%。观察实验组的70例病患经过强化生活方式干预治疗,56例满意,11例一般,其余3例无效,控制率在百分之八十。传统治疗组的病患治疗效果,42例满意,18例一般,其余10例无效。根据观察可以发现控制率在百分之六十。两组治疗效果进行比对,P值小于0.05,具有统计学意义。结论:对于糖尿病患者采取药物加强化生活方式指导干预治疗的手段,能够取得比较明显的治疗效果,此治疗手段值得推广。
Objective: The general team for diabetes patients with intensive lifestyle intervention and treatment, and the treatment effect was observed. Methods: 140 cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in this community were randomly selected for basic disease examination, divided into corridors according to corridor, divided into traditional treatment groups and intensive life style intervention treatment groups, each group of 70 patients . The patients were divided into routine medical treatment and Johnson & Johnson lifestyle interventions to observe the treatment course within six months and HbA1c after six months. Results: Satisfaction was Hb A1c = ≤6.5%, generally Hb A1c = 6.5-7.5% and invalid for Hb A1c≥7.6%. Seventy patients in the experimental group were treated with intensive lifestyle intervention, 56 were satisfied, 11 were normal and the remaining 3 were ineffective with a control rate of 80%. The treatment effect of the traditional treatment group, 42 patients satisfied, 18 cases in general, the remaining 10 cases ineffective. According to the observation can be found in the control rate of 60%. The treatment effect of two groups were compared, P value less than 0.05, with statistical significance. Conclusion: It is worth to popularize the treatment of diabetic patients that they can take the obvious therapeutic effect by using the method of drug-induced lifestyle intervention.