论文部分内容阅读
在民事诉讼制度中,反诉制度是一项重要的制度。英美法系对反诉制度功能的发挥持积极的态度,注重实用,利用反诉制度一次性解决与之相关的纠纷,同时对反诉严格区分为强制反诉与任意反诉;而大陆法系对反诉制度的功能持保守的态度,注重理论的完整性,严格遵守关联性要件理论。在对反诉作出深刻认识的基础上,通过对比英美法系与大陆法系不同的反诉观,利用我国现有的反诉理论,提出我国应当注重实用,引入英美法系的强制反诉理论,做为完善我国反诉制度的指向。
In civil litigation system, counterclaim system is an important system. The Anglo-American legal system holds a positive attitude toward the function of the counterclaim system, pays attention to practicality, uses the counterclaim system to settle disputes related to it at one time, and strictly divides the counterclaim into compulsory counterclaim and any counterclaim. However, Hold a conservative attitude, pay attention to the integrity of the theory, strict compliance with the requirements of relevance theory. On the basis of a deep understanding of counterclaims, by contrasting the different counterclaim views between Anglo-American law system and civil law system and using the existing counterclaim theory of our country, this paper puts forward that our country should pay attention to practicality and introduce the compulsory counterclaim theory of Anglo-American legal system, The Point of China ’s Counterclaim System.