论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较改良双克氏针切开复位内固定法与传统术式治疗撕脱骨折型锤状指患者的近远期疗效。方法:回顾性选取2016年1月至2018年10月永康市骨科医院收治的85例撕脱骨折型锤状指患者，45例患者接受改良双克氏针切开复位内固定手术纳入观察组，40例患者接受传统抽出钢丝法固定手术纳入对照组。记录患者手术时间、骨折愈合时间、并发症，术后3个月评价近期疗效，术后随访1年进行指关节功能评分评价远期预后。结果:观察组手术时间短于对照组(n P0.05)。n 结论:改良双克氏针切开复位内固定法治疗撕脱骨折型锤状指，操作简单，骨折愈合快，远近期疗效优于传统抽出钢丝法。“,”Objective:To compare short-term and long-term curative effect of modified double Kirschner wire open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and traditional surgery on patients with mallet fingers of avulsion fracture type.Methods:Eighty-five patients with mallet fingers of avulsion fracture type who were admitted to Yongkang Orthopaedic Hospital from January 2016 to October 2018 were enrolled. 45 patients received modified double Kirschner wire ORIF were included in the observation group, while 40 patients who underwent traditional extracting wire fixation were included into control group. The operation time, fracture healing time and complications were recorded. At 3 months after surgery, short-term curative effect was evaluated. After 1-year postoperative follow-up, long-term prognosis was evaluated by finger joint function scoring.Results:The operation time of observation group was shorter than that of control group (n P0.05).n Conclusions:The modified double Kirschner wire ORIF for the treatment of avulsion fracture mallet finger has the advantages of simple operation, fast fracture healing and better long-term and short-term curative effect than the traditional wire extraction method.