论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨新产程标准处理产程的可行性分析。方法对照组100例以Fredman产程图处理产程,研究组100例以新产程标准处理产程,对比其剖宫产、阴道助产、催产素使用、产后出血、母体产伤、胎儿窘迫、新生儿窒息、产褥病率等有无差异。结果研究组剖宫产率及催产素使用率(12.00%、10.00%),均明显低于对照组(23.00%、27.00%),差异比较有统计学意义(P<0.05);而在催产素使用率、产后出血率、母体产伤率、胎儿窘迫率、新生儿窒息率及产褥病率等方面,两组差异比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论胎新产程标准处理产程通过减少人工干预,可有效降低剖宫产率及催产素使用率,值得临床进一步推广普及。
Objective To explore the feasibility of new production process standard process of production process. Methods One hundred patients in the control group were treated with the procedure of Fredman, and 100 in the study group were treated with the standard of new labor. Cesarean section, vaginal delivery, oxytocin use, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal birth injury, fetal distress, neonatal asphyxia , Puerperal morbidity and other no difference. Results The cesarean section rate and oxytocin utilization rate (12.00%, 10.00%) in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (23.00%, 27.00%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05) The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, maternal injury rate, fetal distress rate, neonatal asphyxia and puerperal morbidity were not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Conclusions The new birth process standardized birth process can reduce cesarean section rate and oxytocin utilization rate effectively by reducing manual intervention, which deserves further popularization in clinical practice.