论文部分内容阅读
对刑事没收的对象范围的准确界定,有助于解决实务部门适用没收的混淆与困惑,防止犯罪行为人的合法财产受到公权机关的任意剥夺。没收的对象范围,还决定了刑事诉讼中相关审前财产保全措施的范围。我国司法实务中存在的退赔被害人财产的急迫需要,导致了实务中审前财产保全措施突破了法律及司法解释的规定,扩大到被追诉人的普通财产,产生了“一揽子扣押冻结”现象。基于对被追诉人财产权保障的考虑,刑事司法制度应增订相关的实体法与程序法规则,以明确刑事没收及其保全的对象范围。
Accurately defining the scope of the target of criminal confiscation helps to confuse confusion and confusion applicable to confiscation in the substantive departments and prevents the arbitrary property deprivation of the legal property of criminal perpetrators. The scope of the confiscated objects also determines the scope of the relevant pre-trial property preservation measures in criminal proceedings. The urgent need for the repatriation of victims’ property in judicial practice in our country led to the fact that in practice, the pre-trial property preservation measures broke through the provisions of law and judicial interpretation and expanded to the common property of the people being prosecuted, resulting in the phenomenon of “a package of freezing and freezing” . Based on the consideration of the property rights of the prosecutors, the criminal justice system should update the relevant substantive and procedural laws to clarify the scope of criminal confiscation and the object of its preservation.