论文部分内容阅读
目的了解医学院学生考试焦虑和应对方式的特点,为对考试焦虑的干预提供理论依据。方法采用《考试焦虑量表》(TAS)和《应对方式问卷》对260名医学生进行问卷调查。结果医学生中有高等级水平考试焦虑的占12.7%;考试焦虑存在年级差异,性别差异不显著;应对方式年级差异不显著,性别差异在解决问题、自责、求助、幻想、合理化因子上不显著,在退避因子上男女差异显著;考试焦虑与应对方式的相关性研究表明:考试焦虑与解决问题、求助存在并不显著的负相关,与自责、幻想、退避、合理化存在显著的正相关。结论积极应对能缓解考试焦虑,消极应对则反之。
Objective To understand the characteristics of medical college students’ test anxiety and coping styles and to provide a theoretical basis for the intervention of test anxiety. Methods A total of 260 medical students were surveyed using TAS and Coping Style Questionnaire. Results There were 12.7% of the students with high-level test anxiety. There were grade differences in test anxiety and no significant gender differences. There was no significant difference in coping style grades. Gender differences in solving problems, self-blame, asking for help, illusions and rationalization factors were not significant Significantly, there are significant differences between men and women in the evacuation factor. The correlation between test anxiety and coping styles shows that there is no significant negative correlation between test anxiety and problem solving and help seeking, and there is a significant positive correlation with test self-blame, fantasy, retreat and rationalization . Conclusion Positive coping can relieve test anxiety, while negative coping is the other way around.