论文部分内容阅读
前些年,理论学界出现一种新的观点,那就是很多学者认为新古典综合是管理主义与宪政主义的综合。但是近些年行政管理学界通过大量的研究得出结论,新古典综合不能被认为是管理主义和宪政主义的综合。新古典综合是以马歇尔为代表的新古典经济学和凯恩斯经济理论的综合。管理主义与新古典经济学有一点点的联系。新古典经济学是管理主义的众多理论基础之一。但事实上管理主义与新古典经济学也有很大区别。宪政主义与凯恩斯经济理论有一点点的联系,但也有很大区别。本文通过阐述管理主义,宪政主义和新古典综合,最终得出结论:新古典综合不是管理主义与宪政主义的综合。
A few years ago, a new point of view emerged in the field of theoretical scholarship that many scholars believe that neoclassical synthesis is a combination of management and constitutionalism. However, in recent years, the field of administration has concluded through a large number of studies that the neoclassical synthesis can not be regarded as a combination of management and constitutionalism. Neoclassical synthesis is a combination of neoclassical economics represented by Marshall and Keynesian economic theory. There is a little connection between managementism and neoclassical economics. Neoclassical economics is one of the many theoretical foundations of management. But in fact management and neoclassical economics are also very different. There is a little connection between constitutionalism and Keynesian economic theory, but there are also big differences. By elaborating management, constitutionalism and neoclassical synthesis, this article concludes that neoclassical synthesis is not a combination of management and constitutionalism.