论文部分内容阅读
随着科学和社会经济发展,大量的野生珍贵物种被人工养殖、培育,许多天然生长的珍贵物种也存在本身珍贵程度的差异和区域分布特点,《刑法》第341条和第344条将破坏该类珍贵野生动植物种的行为统一直接上升为刑法打击局面,严厉的制裁措施不仅与当前经济发展导向相背离,也不利于野生动植物种真正保护,给实务部门造成很大困惑。本文以珍贵、濒危野生物种保护的目的为视角,结合宽严相济的刑事政策,从刑法规制和野生动植物种保护法设置两方面对上述现象进行分析和发反思,指出仅仅依靠严打不能从根本上实现物种保护和林区稳定,实务部门在追诉破坏生物多样性犯罪行为时应注意非犯罪化处理的理性和依据。
With the scientific and socio-economic development, a great deal of wild precious species have been artificially cultivated and cultivated. Many precious species of natural growth also have their own precious degree of difference and regional distribution. Articles 341 and 344 of the Criminal Law will undermine the The unification of the behaviors of rare wild animal and plant species directly rose to the criminal law to crack down on the situation. Severe sanctions not only deviated from the direction of current economic development, but also detrimental to the true protection of wild animal and plant species, causing great confusion to the substantive departments. From the perspective of the protection of rare and endangered wild species, combined with the criminal policy of temper justice with mercy, this article analyzes and reflects on the above phenomena from both the regulation of criminal law and the establishment of wildlife species protection law. It points out that relying on strict punishment can not fundamentally To realize the protection of species and the stability of the forest area, the substantive departments should pay attention to the rationality and basis of non-criminalization when prosecuting crimes of undermining biodiversity.