论文部分内容阅读
针对《侵权责任法》第五十八条的推定,部分学者主张其应适用推定过错责任原则;部分学者主张应适用过错责任原则。本文认为,以适用过错责任原则为宜。因为第五十八条的规定仍然属于医疗技术损害领域,该条款中所列举的三种情形的作用,都是在发生医疗技术损害的情况下,应当适用过错责任原则。并且将其理解为适用过错责任原则更有利于在患方和医方之间公平的分配举证责任的负担,更有利于案件公正、有效的处理。
According to the presumption of Article 58 of Tort Liability Law, some scholars claim that it should apply the principle of presumption of fault liability; some scholars advocate that the principle of fault liability should be applied. This paper argues that it is appropriate to apply the principle of liability for fault. Because the provisions of Article 58 still belong to the field of medical technology damage, the three kinds of situations listed in the Article all play the role of fault liability principle in the event of medical technology damage. And understand it as applying the principle of fault liability is more conducive to the fair burden of burden of proof allotted between the patient and the doctor, more conducive to the fair and effective handling of the case.