论文部分内容阅读
案例回顾:某地政府采购中心接受委托,采用竞争性谈判方式就一个自动录播系统项目进行采购,项目预算75万元。谈判文件在网上发布后,有8家单位递交谈判响应文件,其中两家因演示产品型号与谈判响应文件所描述产品型号不一致,谈判响应文件被判无效。经过综合评审,6家通过资格性审查的供应商之一的A公司以42万元的报价成为拟成交供应商。B公司对这一结果有异议,
Case Review: A local government procurement center entrusted with the use of competitive negotiation on an automatic recording and broadcasting system project procurement, project budget 750,000 yuan. After the negotiation documents were released online, 8 units submitted negotiation response documents, of which two were inconsistent with the product models described in the demonstration product models and the negotiation response documents, and the negotiation response documents were found to be invalid. After a comprehensive review, A passed the qualification review of one of the suppliers to 42 million yuan to become a supplier of the proposed contract. Company B disagreed with the result,