论文部分内容阅读
易培基任故宫博物院院长期间,于1929年12月向国民政府行政院呈文,对前不久面世的《清史稿》予以否定,具体列举其十九项谬误,而其中前七项属政治方面的荦荦大端,体现了他维护辛亥革命和民国的立场。他更早就有过证误《清史例目》之事,与指摘《清史稿》是基于类同立场。此次呈文结果,易对《清史稿》的指摘和封禁要求得到政府认可,而社会舆论方面,呼应之外也有异议乃至非议,反映出各方着眼点及立场的差异。这些应该成为今人研究视域中的“平等”历史素材。
During his tenure as dean of the National Palace Museum, Yi Pei Ji submitted a letter to the Executive Yuan of the National Government in December 1929, denying the Qing history draft, which was published not long ago, and specifically listed 19 fallacies, of which the first seven were political Somber, showing his position of maintaining the 1911 Revolution and the Republic of China. Earlier, he had had a testimony of the “case of Qing history,” and accused the “Qing history draft” is based on the same position. The result of this submission makes it easy for the accusation and closure of the “History of the Qing Dynasty” to be approved by the government. In the area of public opinion, there are also objections and even criticisms in addition to those echoed by the public opinion, which reflect the differences among the various parties and their positions. These should become the “equal” historical material in the field of modern research.