关于安阳王系蜀王子的传说,《史记》、《汉书》没有记载。唯有《交州外域记》一书出后,才辗转相抄,成为定论。越南史学家虽有争论,然当作存疑,仍放在他们所写的历史中。我自觉浅薄,然既有质疑,觉得仍应直抒,请教于前辈学者及同行。 On the Prince of Shu Anyi Wang Shu legend, “Historical Records”, “Han” is not documented. Only “cross the state outside the domain of mind,” a book was only after removed copy, a conclusion. Although the Vietnamese historians have argued, they are still in doubt as to what history they write. I am consciously superficial, but both have questions, think it should still direct expression, consult in the older scholars and peers.