论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨以生态学方法为主的综合防制城镇居民区家鼠的措施。方法：比较综合防制与单纯药物防制家鼠的效果。结果：试验区鼠密度一直控制在较低水平，而且从1996年5月至今维持在国家规定标准（3％）以下；药物区除投药后1～2个月内鼠密度暂时下降外，大多数月份均在6％以上，且从未下降到3％以下的国家标准；空白区除试验开始后药物杀灭使鼠密度下降外，从第2个月起一直超过6％，大多数月份在12％～13％。结论：综合防制不仅可以取得与单纯药物相同的甚至更好的灭鼠效果，且可减少或避免药物对环境的污染、人畜误食及二次中毒、灭效维持时间不长、鼠类易产生耐药性和抗药性、耗费大量人、财、物力等副作用或弊端。
Objective: To explore the ecological methods based comprehensive prevention and control measures of urban residents in urban areas. Methods: To compare the effect of comprehensive prevention and simple drug control of domestic mice. Results: The rat density in the experimental area was kept at a relatively low level and remained below the national standard (3%) from May 1996 up to now. In the drug area, the rat density decreased temporarily within 1 to 2 months after administration. Most Month, and never dropped below 3%. Blank areas continued to exceed 6% from the second month except for drug kill after the start of the experiment, and most of the months were at 12 % ~ 13%. Conclusion: The comprehensive prevention and control can not only achieve the same or even better anti-rat effect as that of simple drugs, but also reduce or avoid the pollution of the drugs to the environment, the human and animal eating and secondary poisoning, Produce resistance and resistance, consuming a large number of people, financial, material and other side effects or disadvantages.