论文部分内容阅读
目的研究介入方案治疗对冠心病心绞痛的临床治疗效果。方法选取2014年2月到2016年2月冠心病心绞痛患者78例,随机分为两组,对照组40例患者采用保守治疗,即服用阿司匹林与氯吡格雷进行抗血小板治疗,再辅以肝素抗凝;观察组38例患者进行冠状动脉造影检查及经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗。结果观察组患者中无效1例,有效23例,显效14例,治疗有效率为97.4%;对照组患者中无效11例,有效18例,显效11例,治疗有效率为72.5%,观察组的治疗效果明显比对照组好(P<0.05)。结论良好的饮食控制及药物治疗对改善患者的长期治疗效果具有积极的意义,但PCI可有效缓解梗死血管情况,恢复正常血流,对于多部位大面积梗死患者来说,PCI是临床救治中首选的治疗方法。
Objective To study the clinical effect of interventional regimen on angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. Methods From February 2014 to February 2016, 78 patients with coronary heart disease and angina pectoris were randomly divided into two groups. 40 patients in the control group received conservative treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel for antiplatelet therapy, followed by heparin The observation group of 38 patients underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Results In the observation group, 1 patient was ineffective, 23 were effective, 14 were markedly effective, and the effective rate was 97.4%. In the control group, 11 were ineffective, 18 were effective, 11 were markedly effective, and the effective rate was 72.5% The treatment effect was significantly better than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusions Good dietary control and medication have a positive effect on improving the long-term therapeutic effect of patients. However, PCI can effectively relieve infarct blood vessels and restore normal blood flow, and PCI is the first choice for clinical treatment in patients with large infarcts in multiple sites The treatment.