论文部分内容阅读
学说是否是我国国际私法渊源,没有统一的结论。从立法上看,学说不是我国法的渊源,自然也不是国际私法的渊源;从法学理论上看,不能简单地认为学说是我国国际私法的渊源,必须先对“学说”和“法律渊源”的含义予以清晰、必要的界定,再从理论上分析;从司法实践上看,学说不适合作为我国国际私法的渊源。总之从实然角度看,至少立法和司法上,学说不是我国国际私法渊源;从应然角度看,学说也不应该是我国国际私法渊源。
Whether doctrine is the source of our private international law, there is no uniform conclusion. From a legislative point of view, doctrine is not the origin of our law, nor is it the origin of private international law. From the perspective of jurisprudence, we can not simply think that doctrine is the origin of our country’s private international law. We must first study the doctrine of doctrine and law Origin "is clearly defined and necessary, and then analyzed theoretically; from the perspective of judicial practice, doctrine is not suitable as the origin of private international law in our country. In short, from a practical point of view, at least legislation and judicature, doctrine is not the source of our country’s private international law; from the point of view, the theory should not be the source of our country’s private international law.